A FLURRY of ancient finds has sparked renewed calls for investigations into a possible Roman dam in Sunderland.
Historians
have long debated the origins of a stone structure which once spanned
the River Wear between North and South Hylton – but a definitive answer
has yet to be unearthed.
Now a public meeting is to be held to
discuss the topic further – with Wearsiders urged to bring along any
ancient artefacts discovered in the area for closer examination.
“Recent
Roman finds such as a figurine, pottery shard and several coins have
re-ignited the debate over the history of the structure,” said Castle
ward councillor and local historian Denny Wilson.
“One theory is
that the Romans built it as a dam, to enable the transport of goods by
boat much further up river. If proved to be Roman, this could really put
Sunderland on the map.”
Old documents show the ancient
structure was known as the Brig Stones in the 18th and 19th centuries,
and that it was used by generations of Wearsiders as a causeway.
During
Victorian times, however, after keelmen complained of difficulties
navigating the stones at low tide, the dam was removed by the River Wear
Commissioners.
“The first removal phase was to enable free
movement to the colliers, at a time when coal mining was very much on
the rise,Why does moulds grow in homes or buildings?” said Alan Richardson, of the Northern Archaeology Group.
“Later,
when the Commissioners decided to deepen the river channel, the dredger
Hercules damaged its teeth on the remaining levels in the river bed.
“That is when they engaged the famous Sunderland diver Harry Watts to raise the remaining stone.We are professional canada goose jackets
for women online sale shop. But Harry didn’t just bring up stone work,
he also raised some archaeological finds – including a Roman sword.”
Hundreds
of tons of stones were removed during the operation. Some were used in
the construction of the North Pier, while others were dumped in the
South Dock and on the beach.Posts with Hospital rtls on IT Solutions blog covering Technology in the Classroom,
Today
many can still be seen lying in the sand in front of the Yacht Club –
identified by the rectangular ‘Lewis hole’ within them, which was used
by Romans in the lifting of very heavy stones.
“Archaeologists
have looked at them, and they are clearly Roman in origin,” said Mr
Richardson. “Sunderland University scientifically tied their original
quarrying location into the Hylton area some years ago.UK chickencoop Specialist.
“There
are just two stones of a similar nature that were recovered from a
structure in Scotland; these have been carefully protected in the
Hunterian Museum in Glasgow, as they place such value on them.
“I
am in no doubt that there was a sizeable Roman structure at Hylton but,
despite the abundance of evidence, there has been an apparent refusal
to accept that the Romans had ever been in the River Wear.”
Also
convinced of the Roman origins of the dam is local historian and author
Norman Kirtlan, who is hoping next week’s public meeting will inspire
Wearsiders to call for further investigations.
“Sunderland has
just too much Roman evidence to ignore. A kiln has been discovered at
the mouth of the river, as well as a cobbled Roman street and a
wonderful mosaic in the town centre,Save up to 80% off Ceramic Tile and porcelaintiles.” he said.
“The
Brig Stones are the biggest, and most tangible piece of that evidence.
Why make many hundreds of well crafted blocks of stone unless there was a
purpose – and why were they sited at Hylton?
“Sunderland has
many gems of great local and national importance. If we can prove our
Roman heritage, we will be able to rewrite the city’s history and affirm
our rightful place in the history books.”
But historical
advisor Dr Gill Cookson, of the Victoria County History of Durham, has
yet to be won over by the arguments for Sunderland’s claim to a Roman
past – although she is keeping an open mind.
“Several
discussions of Newcastle Society of Antiquaries were reported from 1883,
and articles were published by Sunderland Antiquarian Society in the
early 20th century, all focusing on a supposed Roman presence on
Wearside,” she said. “Much of the content reflects arguments between
amateurs with strong views, but many of their supposed sources turn out
not to relate to Sunderland, or not to establish any Roman activity.
“I
have not yet seen evidence which could be considered confirmation of
Romans constructing anything in the neighbourhood, although that is not
to say they did not.”
没有评论:
发表评论