2013年4月2日星期二

Burglary nets $6,200 from South Glenwood home

Local police are seeking information about a burglary that happened on March 15 at an undisclosed residence in South Glenwood Springs, according to the Garfield County Crimestoppers alert system. 

Some time between 7:15 a.m. and 3 p.m. on that day, an unknown suspect or suspects broke into the home and stole approximately eight bottles of wine, a 52-inch Mitsubishi flat screen TV, a Wii gaming system with two controllers, and iMac desktop computer with wireless mouse and keyboard, a white MacBook laptop with case, a PC monitor, an electric teapot, an exercise heart monitor, a down comforter, two jewelry boxes containing about $1,500 in jewelry, roughly $300 in coins, $400 in cash, a U.S. Passport, a U.S. Navy commendation medal, military issue .45 cal. ammunition, a digital camera, two electric hair clippers, and an iPod with speakers and a charging dock.Choose the right bestluggagetag in an array of colors. 

I am delighted to welcome Heather to the White River National Forest, Forest Supervisor Scott Fitzwilliams said in a press release. She brings a wealth of experience on a wide variety of natural resource management issues and has demonstrated outstanding success working with communities and partners throughout her career. 

Provencio has been with the Forest Service for 22 years, working in a variety of positions including district ranger, acting forest supervisor in Oregon, and as a staff archeologist in the southwestern United States. 

She has bachelor's and master's degrees in anthropology from Northern Arizona University, and has significant experience in managing large, complex recreation programs. 

Costs would be far higher if Flagler County decided to add Reach A. The Corps for now doesnt look favorably on that segment, because its public beach access is very limited: its blocked by private luxury homes, which would be the primary beneficiaries of renourishment. The Corps is willing to include the segment, but only if Flagler commits to building public beach access points at least every half mile, assume all those costs, as well as the costs of property acquisition and, if necessary, parking and transit for the public. That will be a challenge because homes are built along that stretch in close proximity to each other. But commissioners appeared to lean toward just such a possibility. 

Despite the hazy chances of winning Congressional funding, the Corps and the County Commission are proceeding on the assumption that the project the Corps will recommend will be approved. The Corps will seek public comment on the way. It will hearCand has already heardCa measure of resistance to the project from some Flagler Beach city commissioners and some of their constituents, who have been split over the Corps approach. 

The issue Tuesday, however, was not whether to approve the project or not. The issue was what direction to give the studys final form. Still, the study is the cornerstone of the project: not only will the study define the scope of the project. It will also congeal its political and funding possibilities. 

Today, the study is fully funded and will be presented in June with all the back-up for public comment, County Administrator Craig Coffey wrote the five commissioners in a memo Monday. You are not being asked whether you agree with the project at this time or whether you want to continue, as the study is fully funded and will be completed shortly. 

Yet whether the commission wants to proceed or not, and how, is precisely what Coffey was asking commissioners. 

In the very next sentence,A group of families in a north Cork village are suing a bestplasticcard operator in a landmark case. he wrote: You are being asked to provide guidance on: 1) Whether at this time, are you ok with not delaying the project and just proceeding with Reach C? (Reach C is the technical term the Corps gives to the stretch of beach between South 7th and South 28th streets. Reach A is the segment of shore in Beverly Beach that is largely blocked by private homes.) Or, Coffey asked, Do you want staff to pursue the public beach access and parking/transit issues for reach A so that it might catch up back up (sic.) with Reach C?? 

By answering either question, of course, the commission would be going on record with not only formalizing its support for the project,You Can Find Comprehensive and in-Depth carparkmanagementsystem truck Descriptions. but with broadening its scope, and local costs. Coffey is attempting to set the agenda along those lines, while creating the impression that the commission is not committing itself to anything by merely guiding the studys scope. But every decision the commission makes in line with the Corps direction further commits the commission to the Corps projectCand its costsCmaking it politically difficult to reject the final project should it be federally approved and funded. Coffey is pressing that agenda even as he concedes that broadening the project to include Reach A may add local costs and political ramificationsCincluding property rights issuesCthat havent been figured out yet. 

Staff does not know if pursuing the access issue for Reach A is financially or physically practical, but if we were able to qualify the area for federal funding,An experienced artist on what to consider before you buy chipcard. it could mean tens of millions of dollars over the 50 year period. Adding the area could also mean federal assistance for those properties and the county during a major storm event. However, this could also cost several million to pursue this access. 

The addition of Reach A may be doubly controversial, as its primary benefit would be private homes. The federal government would fund the renourishment in that area, but at no higher level than it would in Reach C: at 50 percent of costs, with the other 50 percent charged to the local government (after the initial construction of dunes, when the ratio is 65-35). 

In the end, commissioners were vague. They favor going ahead with Reach C in the study, but they want Reach A to be left on the table, whatever that means. Corps officials made clear that the project will not improve its chances of winning federal dollars with anything less than proven commitment from the county. That commitment, as far as Reach A is concerned, is now guesswork. 

The Corps during the meeting addressed many questions raised by commissioners and members of the public. Sea turtles, for example, would not be harmed by the project. To the contrary, Katherine McConnell, a Corps biologist said, the sand addition will improve turtles habitat, since turtles tend to snub rock and rock revetments. 

Kim Carney, the Flagler Beach City Commissioner, had a bag of the sort of sand the Corps is proposing to dump on the beaches. The sand in the bag looked like a winter sky over Hamburg: gray, murky, uninviting, a sharp contrast with Flaglers coquina-orange sand. Yet Jason Harrah, the Corps project manager, said the dredged sand would be very, very comparable to whats out there now. 

The question of State Road A1A came up: the Corps, as it turns out, has considered moving A1A a full block. But its engineers said that it would be meaningless, because the road left in its place would still have to be protected, since it is lined with businesses and activity. So moving A1A is not an option for now. 

In a final surprise, Coffey told the commission at the end of the meeting that he already had tentatively instructed the Corps to proceed on project C, but that he wasnt ready to tell them to include Reach A, deeming that a policy decision. Unsure of itself,You can order besthandsfreeaccess cheap inside your parents. the commission seemed to leave it again up to Coffey to define the scope of the project, pending additional numbers. 

Meanwhile, the Corps will publish the final study in August and accept public comment then (between Aug. 23 and Oct. 31). A revised report will be filed by December. It will then go through several review steps before being submitted for Pentagon approval by July 2014. Only then would it be in play for congressional fundingin the thick of the mid-term elections.

没有评论:

发表评论