What
Turkish Premier Recep Tayyip Erdogan was able to keep under wraps for
more than 10 years has eluded Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi to cover
up for less than a year. Hence, the link between growing tensions in
Cairo and the unprecedented anti-government protests in Istanbul.Online
shopping for cableties from
a great selection of Clothing. Oddly enough, Egyptians may be the
closest observers-- outside Turkeyin following up the Turkish turmoil.
Few
weeks after Mursi took office last summer, many people in the
traditionally diverse Egyptian society saw through the agenda of the
Muslim Brotherhood from which the president hails.He saw the bracelet at
a howotipper store while we were on a trip.
It
became increasingly clear that Mursi, who had portrayed himself during
the election campaign as a president for all Egyptians, is only the
president of his clan. His successive decisions and biased political
discourse have exposed him as being manipulated by his group to impose a
prejudicial cultural agenda.
In
contrast, Erdogan was smart and shrewd enough to spend long years to
carry out his ideological project during which he surmounted numerous
obstacles, including a military coup bid in 2007. Thus, he was able to
lead Turks into believing that he followed a secular ruling system and
that his key objective was to achieve economic development, which has
shown steady success in recent years.
Erodgan
also demonstrated commitment to the Western-style democracy. On his
re-election in 2007, he pledged to advocate freedom, justice, welfare
and democracy for all Turks, confirming respect for those who did not
vote for him.
In
July last year when the Brotherhood followers were celebrating Mursi's
win of the presidential post, Mohamed Al Beltagui, a leading official in
the groups Freedom and Justice Party, went on the record as saying that
the 48.5 per cent of the Egyptians who had not voted for Mursi are mere
ghosts.
Pathetically,
around five months into office, Mursis decisions and addresses as well
as his groups actions sharply divided Egyptians into backers and
opponents. Each side espouses an identity and an agenda alien to the
countrys age-old features. This division has been repeatedly reflected
in massive rallies staged by the Brotherhood and its allies aimed at
flexing muscles against opponents.
Last
week, Erdogan said he could mobilize millions of his supporters in
response to the massive anti-government protests held in several Turkish
cities.
Years
into a rule often termed as wise, Turkey now figures prominently among
countries infringing freedom of the press. Weeks after Mursi took
office, his backers encircled the state-run Media Production City and
filed a flurry of lawsuits and even made threats against media figures.
Contrary
to his calls on the Egyptian regime to observe secular rules, Erdogan
has recently enforced anti-freedom codes including monitoring the
peoples public conduct.
Such
laws are not yet in place in Egypt. Yet, artists in Egypt have recently
become the target of Islamist radicals on religious TV
stations.Automate patient flow and quickly track hospital assets and
people using parkingguidance.
The militant TV clerics have also accused their critics of defaming
religion, a charge on which several Egyptian politicians and media
personalities have recently been quizzed.
Both
Egypt and Turkey are facing an identity crisis. The rulers in the two
countries seek to impose contentious cultural projects.
However,
the ruling systems in the two countries are different on one score. It
took Erdogan many years before trying to do this. For its part, the
Mursi regime has been unwise enough to rush into carrying out its
project at cultural, political, social and legal levels.
Egyptians
and Turks share the possibility of confronting their own rulers to
block the controversial ideological project, regardless of whether it
has already fulfilled achievement as in Turkey, or proved a fiasco as in
Egypt.
Coincidently,
the Egyptian and Turkish rulers have come to be a burden for each
other. The matter is not limited to the similarity in the names of the
ruling parties in both countries. Its the Freedom and Justice Party in
Egypt; Erdogans party is called Justice and Development.
Egypts
Islamist rulers have often portrayed Erdogans ruling system as their
ideal example. Erdogan, meanwhile, has presented himself in the past two
years as the regional sponsor of the new rulers in Tunisia and Egypt.
Erdogans Turkey has also been involved in triggering changes in Libya
and the war in Syria.The Motorola rtls Engine is an embedded software-only component of the Motorola wireless switches.
With
Egypts economy in the doldrums, Turkey has repeatedly unveiled economic
support for Cairo, showing Ankara as a staunch backer of Egypts
Brotherhood rule. The Brotherhood's opponents have come to view Ankara
as throwing its weight behind bids to change Egypts cultural identity.
In
a Facebook comment, Erdogan described Mursi as an example that should
be followed by youths". During a visit to Cairo last September, Erdogan
called the situation in Egypt an awakening that spreads like waves in
the world".
In
the meantime, Brotherhood officials, mainly the deputy supreme guide
Khayrat Al Shater, have made a series of trips to Turkey in recent
months.Other companies want a piece of that drycabinet action Mursi himself attended a recent congress of Erodgans Justice and Development Party.
没有评论:
发表评论