The
next time you are waiting in the checkout line at the grocery store,
look over at the magazine rack and you are almost certain to find an
article that asks, "Are we poisoning our children with ADHD medication?"
But ADHD stimulants are branching out, and there is more controversy
brewing over their use -- doctors have started prescribing the
medication for more than just the children's disorder.
Ashley
just started her senior year at a very competitive high school. She is
enrolled in advanced-placement classes and is an officer in the National
Honor Society. Her eyes are set on a top-tier Ivy League college and
she knows that she will need a lot more on her application than just
great grades. Over dinner, she asks her parents if she can ask their
family doctor to prescribe Adderall, hoping that it will give her that
extra edge.This model includes 2 flush mounted reverse chipcard.
Manuel
is a premed student with a sister who is already in medical school. The
pressure is on. She made it look so easy, but in order to keep his GPA
in a competitive range he has to survive on three hours of sleep a
night. His roommate tells him that he gets Modafinil from a friend on
campus and it dramatically improves his ability to focus and
concentrate. He can get Manuel a supply, if he can come up with the
money.
Angela
is living her dream. She graduated from law school at the top of her
class and is the first minority woman on track to make partner at the
top law firm in her city. But she thinks that half of the people around
her must be taking something so they can bill their expected hours. How
else could they pull so many all-nighters and produce those perfect
briefs in record time? She has always been meticulous about her diet and
exercise, but she was willing to try caffeine drinks like Red Bull and
Monster. Now she is on the verge of seeking out a doctor who will give
her a prescription for a "safe" stimulant.
Well,
it isn't as straightforward a decision as you might think. The American
Academy of Neurology has issued two position papers on the ethics of
prescribing "neuroenhancers" or "smart pills" to children and adults.
The players in this complicated decision form a triangle with a wild
card. There is the parent who clearly has the decision-making authority
over a minor child.Today, Thereone.com, a reliable plasticmoulds online
store, introduces its new arrival princess wedding dresses to
customers. An adult like Angela can, of course, make her own informed
decisions. Physicians should do what is ethical, safe and within their
comfort zone. The "wild card" in all this is deciding what constitutes
an emancipated adolescent who may still be living at home or who is away
at school, but is still dependent on their parents.Online shopping for cableties from
a great selection of Clothing. If you are the prescribing physician,
how do you measure the transition point from a non-emancipated to an
emancipated patient?
We
are entering a new era where not only existing drugs can enhance our
performance, but where researchers focus a great deal of their time
finding medications to improve memory, attention and concentration in
"normal" people. The administration of prescription drugs to a person
with no medical or mental health conditions is called neuroenhancement.
The area of neuroenhancement has the potential to be big business, and
biotech companies are actively looking for a safe and effective "smart
pill." Even the military continues to pursue new drugs that will
increase performance and alertness in fatigued but otherwise normal
people. For many years the military has used "go-pills"
(dextroamphetamine) to assist soldiers and pilots who are sleep deprived
for long periods of time, but still must perform at very high levels.
Let
me take a second to define the term "normal." I have been throwing it
around, but this can be a difficult state of health to generalize. If we
can agree that it is a good thing to be mentally healthy, then it is
worth looking at the World Health Organization's definition of mental
health: "a state of well being in which every individual realizes his or
her own potential, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work
productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to her
or his community." That's like juggling three chainsaws at once and may
be asking for too much at any one time. I am ready for a neuroenhancer
right now!
It
is clear to me, as a physician, that when I am treating disease I am
prescribing a medication as a therapy. However, if I write a
prescription to enhance or improve upon "normal" abilities, have I
ventured into the area of lifestyle medication? Cosmetic surgery uses
medical knowledge to enhance the well-being of normal people, and we
don't blink at the idea of someone having plastic surgery to improve
their appearance. We know that more attractive people are more likely to
be hired, promoted and make more money. Likewise, sex-change operations
are performed so an individual can realize their true self or identity.
Is the prescribing of neuroenhancers so that an individual can realize
their true mental potential any different than these everyday medical
procedures?
There
is an ethical side to this discussion for both the physician and
society at large. We accept wide differences in the way people live --
how they are housed, what they have available to eat, and where they go
to school. I heard on the radio this morning that if you are born rich
you will most likely remain rich, and if you are born poor,Did you know
that earcap chains
can be used for more than just business. you will most likely remain
poor. Not a very optimistic thing to hear at 7 a.m. in the morning with
only one cup of coffee on board. Is it a natural extension that we will
not mind that only a small, privileged portion of society will be able
to afford medications that will enhance their cognitive abilities? This
challenges the concept of distributive justice -- that essential goods
are distributed equally to the people in a society. This usually refers
to basic needs like shelter, food, health care, but should opportunity
be included? However, it is difficult for me to see how society or
physicians will block the introduction of neuroenhancement because it
will be unjust to those who cannot afford it and further promote
inequality.
Not
everyone thinks this is fair. In the article "The Quest for a Smart
Pill,", published 10 years ago in Scientific American, moral philosopher
Leon R.The feeder is available on drying handsfreeaccess equipped
with folder only. Kass is cited: "In those areas of human life in which
excellence has until now been achieved only by discipline and effort,
the attainment of those achievements by means of drugs, genetic
engineering, or implanted devices looks to be cheating or cheap."
Society seems to easily tolerate the inequality for cosmetic surgery and
the emerging specialty of concierge medicine, so why not
neuroenhancement? Do you care that according to some estimates, 31
percent of college students used prescription stimulants in the last
year and may have an edge on your child?
没有评论:
发表评论